Check out this posted link;

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5535

The statistical analysis of the last election was studied by dozens of university mathematical departments world wide. The overwhelming results were that for the polling to be correct (within 3%) at voting centers where there was a paper trail, and to have 10%, or greater error, in precincts with no paper trail, were highly unlikely. These pollsters are paid millions to be correct by news agencies. They have been doing this for decades, and have become better at it every time because they continue to improve their process. Then suddenly, they don't have any idea what their doing? predicting a double digit victory for Obama and getting a victory Hillary. Now in New Hampshire, where the voting has a paper trail, their on the money again. But, in the 81% of places using voting machines, they completely blew it? Personally, my BS detector has gone off. The program would probably be skimming votes from lower teer candidates to move them to whoever they wanted to win, just to not draw to much attention. Just my two cents.